Value Exposure May Benefit a Diversified Portfolio’s Long-Term Risk and Return Profile

Dear Clients and Friends,

Having been in the asset management business for over half a century, we’ve observed several notable market phenomena, one of which is that investment styles tend to cycle in and out of favor. The duration of each cycle may vary and the catalysts for shifts in style leadership can be unpredictable, but as the famous quote often attributed to Mark Twain says: “History doesn’t repeat itself, but it often rhymes.” Indeed, over the past 50 years, we’ve seen investment styles fall in and out of favor numerous times.

In our opinion, the cyclicality of investment styles underscores the importance of diversification. In this letter, we explore how the Brandes International Equity Strategy could influence the risk and return profile of a diversified portfolio across various cycles. To illustrate this, we created a hypothetical equal-weighted portfolio consisting of the MSCI EAFE Growth Index, the MSCI ACWI ex USA Quality Index, and the MSCI EAFE Momentum Index. We then added the Brandes International Equity Strategy to this portfolio (allocating 25% to each component) to compare its risk and return profiles before and after the addition.

During the “long winter” for the value investment style—from 12/31/06 to 9/30/20, which marked the longest and largest underperformance of MSCI EAFE Value relative to MSCI EAFE Growth since their inception—many investors decided to abandon value due to its disappointing performance. While having value exposure (represented by Brandes International Equity) over this particular period did diminish the hypothetical portfolio’s returns (see Exhibit 2), maintaining a consistent value exposure over the long term helped enhance returns and reduce tracking error (see Exhibit 4).

Prior to Global Financial Crisis: Value-Led Cycle (2/29/00 to 12/31/06)

After a period of largely ignoring valuations, especially for tech-related businesses, investors started paying attention again to company fundamentals post-tech bubble, prompting a value-led cycle (MSCI EAFE Value vs. MSCI EAFE Growth) that lasted nearly seven years. Adding the Brandes International Equity Strategy to the hypothetical diversified portfolio would have enhanced return, while reducing tracking error.

The Long Winter for Value: Growth-Led Cycle (12/31/06 to 9/30/20)

The low-growth economic environment, growing popularity of index investing, and easy money made available by central banks worldwide led to a willingness among investors to “pay up” for any growth potential. Amid the long winter for value, many investors reduced their value allocations, and some traditional “value” managers allowed their investing styles to drift in hopes of improving short-term performance and asset gathering. The valuation gap between value and growth widened to historical highs across various metrics (e.g., price/book, price/earnings, price/cash flows, enterprise value/earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization), and many wondered about the “death of value investing.”

Current Value-Led Cycle (9/30/20 to 8/31/24)

After being out of favor for more than a decade, value stocks made a remarkable comeback in the fourth quarter of 2020, driven by optimism about post-COVID economic recovery, rising inflation, and higher interest rates. Although the recovery of value stocks has not been linear, with bouts of growth outperformance during the cycle, incorporating the Brandes International Equity Strategy into the hypothetical diversified portfolio could have generated higher return and lower tracking error. It is important to note that even after value’s outperformance, the valuation discount for value stocks relative to growth remains historically high across various metrics.

Summary – Value Exposure May Benefit a Diversified Portfolio Over the Long Term

Despite the long value winter accounting for over half of the past 25 years, having value exposure was beneficial to both risk and return of a diversified portfolio across the three periods discussed above (see Exhibit 4).

We do not know when a style cycle will turn or what the next catalyst for the shift in style leadership will be. However, we believe incorporating value exposure—especially through a partnership with a manager such as Brandes that has maintained a consistent approach to value—may benefit a diversified portfolio from a long-term risk and return perspective.

Thank you,

Brandes Investment Partners

Archives

  • Commentary

    Brandes Letter – October 2024

    In this letter, we explore how value exposure could influence the risk and return profile of a diversified portfolio across various cycles. To illustrate this, we created a hypothetical equal-weighted portfolio consisting of the MSCI EAFE Growth Index, the MSCI ACWI ex USA Quality Index, and the MSCI EAFE Momentum Index. We then added the Brandes International Equity Strategy to this portfolio (allocating 25% to each component) to compare its risk and return profiles before and after the addition. As it turns out, value investing is not dead!
  • Commentary

    Brandes Letter – March 2024

    Today we celebrate 50 years since the founding of Brandes Investment Partners. As noted in the 1974 letter from Benjamin Graham to Charles Brandes, the firm was to be operated along “Graham principles” and we are proud to say that it is still operated exactly that way today.
  • Commentary

    Brandes Letter – November 2023

    With financial media full of articles and reports about the challenges of investing in China, many investors wonder if China is even investible given its current economic troubles, the geopolitical tensions surrounding Taiwan, and many other factors. In this letter, we share some observations about how we navigate this major market on behalf of our clients. We are cognizant of the significant macro issues and believe selectivity is key when evaluating investment candidates. As with all investments that we make, we do our fundamental work to determine if our estimation of the risk/reward trade-off (relative to opportunities elsewhere) is appropriate for deployment of client capital.
  • Commentary

    Brandes Letter – June 2023

    The June 2023 "Brandes Letter: Investing is a People Business" emphasizes the human role in investing. Ted Kim, our automotive analyst, exemplifies our ideal of independent thinking. Our process involves research, investment committees, and the margin of safety principle (the margin of safety is the discount of a security’s market price to our estimate of its intrinsic value). Ted's view on Tesla highlights the firm's approach to estimating a company’s valuation. Our letter underscores Brandes' belief in human insight as we seek to create value for our clients.
  • Commentary

    Brandes Letter – February 2023

    The State of Value Investing
  • Commentary

    Brandes Letter - October 2022

    Has the 40-year fixed income party come to an end?
  • Commentary

    Brandes Letter – July 2022

    How being “Purpose-built for Value” makes Brandes different
  • Commentary

    Brandes Letter – March 2022

    The enduring value of Graham Principles
  • Commentary

    Brandes Letter – January 2022

    The case for “value” in a well-diversified portfolio
  • Commentary

    Brandes Letter – October 2021

    “Value” is in the eye of the beholder
  • Commentary

    Brandes Letter – July 2021

    Fundamental, research driven investing
  • Commentary

    Brandes Letter – March 2021

    Could inflation be a tailwind for value stocks?